Ventilation for low dissipated energy achieved using flow control during both inspiration and expiration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2018.09.003Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • A new type of ventilator provides full control of both inspiration and expiration.

  • The ventilator establishes (in- and expiratory) flow-controlled ventilation (FCV).

  • FCV uses continuous direct tracheal pressure and flow measurement and near-constant inspiratory and expiratory flow rates.

  • FCV has potential to provide a precise view of respiratory mechanics of a ventilated patient.

  • FCV with an I:E ratio of 1:1 minimises energy dissipation down to physical limits.

Abstract

Mechanical or thermal stresses, which cause injury, do so essentially by dissipating energy in the tissue at a rate above some threshold at which damage occurs. This principle may also be applied to a ventilated lung. Minimizing dissipated energy is therefore a promising strategy to prevent ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) [1].

In this special interest paper, we present a qualitative argument to show that dissipated energy as determined from the area enclosed by the pressure-volume (PV) loop may be minimised during ventilation by controlling the flow to be constant during both inspiration and expiration. We then demonstrate the characteristics of the PV loop and concomitant low energy dissipation that occur with this mode of ventilation in a clinical case report. In this case, we ventilated a healthy, male, 51 year old patient undergoing elective, minor laryngeal surgery with a new, specialized ventilator, which achieves accurate control of flow during both inspiration and expiration (Evone; Ventinova Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) through a small-bore (4.4 mm outer diameter), cuffed tracheal tube (Tritube; Ventinova Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). This mode of ventilation is called flow-controlled ventilation (FCV). During ventilation, both inspiratory and expiratory flows were kept nearly constant at 12 ± 0.98 l/min and the I:E ratio was 1:1 with a minute volume of 6.23 ± 0.15 l/min. We recorded pressure-volume loops using pressure measured directly within the patient's trachea and calculated the energy dissipated in the patient from the hysteresis area of the PV loops.

Energy dissipation was 0.17 ± 0.02 J/l, which is close to the minimum energy dissipation achievable for this minute volume. It is lower than values quoted in the literature for spontaneous breathing (0.2–0.7 J/l) and indicative values obtained with other methods of flow control (0.32 J/l). This ventilation strategy may have implications for lung-protective ventilation.

Keywords

Dissipated energy
Expiratory ventilation assistance
Flow-controlled ventilation
Ventilator induced lung injury
Lung-protective ventilation
Evone

Cited by (0)