Journal Information
Vol. 16. Issue 2.
Pages 253-272 (March - April 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 16. Issue 2.
Pages 253-272 (March - April 2010)
Artigo Original/Original Article
Open Access
Quais os parâmetros funcionais que permitem diferenciar asma grave de DPOC?
Which functional parameters can help differentiate severe asthma from COPD?
Visits
6669
Ricardo Marques Dias1,
Corresponding author
dias.ricardomarques@gmail.com

Correspondência/Correspondence to: Ricardo Marques Dias, Rua Barão da Torre 388/104, Rio de Janeiro – Brasil – 22411000,
, Fernando Hauaji Chacur2, Sonia Regina da Silva Carvalho3, Denise Duprat Neves4
1 Prof. Titular da Disciplina Cardiopulmonar da UNIRIO/Full Professor, Cardiopulmonary Sciences, UNIRIO
2 Médico Responsável pelo Serviço de Provas de Função Respiratória do Pró-Cardíaco/Head Physician, Respiratory Function Test Unit, Hospital Pró-Cardíaco
3 Prof.ª Adjunta da Disciplina Cardiopulmonar da UNIRIO/Assistant Professor, Cardiopulmonary Sciences, UNIRIO
4 Prof.ª Associada da Disciplina Cardiopulmonar da UNIRIO/Assistant Professor, Cardiopulmonary Sciences, UNIRIO
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Resumo

Com o objectivo de identificar parâmetros funcionais respiratórios que contribuam para o diagnóstico diferencial entre asma e DPOC, estudámos 20 asmáticos e 30 bronquíticos, com ou sem enfisema, com os exames usuais de função pulmonar: espirografia, pletismografia e DLCO, pré e pós-broncodilatação para os dois primeiros exames. Os grupos apresentam diferenças significativas na sua constituição. Os asmáticos são mais jovens, média de 48 anos, contra 59 anos no grupo com DPOC, e o grupo é constituído predominantemente por mulheres, 65% contra 40%, respectivamente. Os exames funcionais pulmonares, realizados conforme as directrizes internacionais, mostram, pela espirografia, que os asmáticos têm obstrução mais intensa, VEF1/CVF de 59 versus 66 e maior resposta broncodilatadora pelo VEF1, quer em valor absoluto, quer por variação percentual, do basal (%) ou do valor previsto (%P). A DLCO mostra-se, em média, normal entre os asmáticos, 103%P, e diminuída no grupo com DPOC, 69%P. Na pletismografia constatámos que os asmáticos têm maior volume residual (%P) e resistência de vias aéreas. Concluímos que vários parâmetros funcionais diferenciam a asma da DPOC, como um grupo; na análise individual, a DLCO é o parâmetro que melhor discrimina as duas doenças, possuindo maior especificidade para o diagnóstico de DPOC, seguida pelas variações de VEF1na broncodilatação, com maior sensibilidade para o diagnóstico de asma. Desta forma, estes dois exames são destaque no diagnóstico diferencial das doenças obstrutivas.

Rev Port Pneumol 2010; XVI (2): 253-272

Palavras-chave:
Testes de função pulmonar
asma
DPOC
Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the respiratory function parameters that help in the accurate diagnosis of asthma and COPD. We studied 20 asthma and 30 COPD patients who underwent lung function tests including spirometry and plethysmography both with bronchodilator test and diffusion with carbon monoxide (DLCO). The tests were performed according to International Guidelines (ATS/ERS). The asthma patients were younger (mean age=48) than those in the COPD group (mean age=59) and this group also had more female patients (65%) than the COPD group (40%). The results showed a more severe obstruction in the asthma group: FEV1/FVC=59% versus 66% for COPD. There was also a greater bronchodilator response as shown by changes in absolute and percentage values for FEV1 in the asthma group. Average DLCO values were normal in the asthma group (103%P) and lower in the COPD (69%). In plethysmography the asthma group had a higher residual volume (%P) and a higher airway resistance. We concluded that many functional parameters were useful in distinguishing the asthma and COPD groups. In individual analysis, DLCO was the parameter which best aided in an accurate diagnosis in both groups, with a higher specificity for COPD. The bronchodilator response measured by changes in FEV1 showed a higher sensitivity for asthma. Thus, these two tests are highlighted in the differential diagnosis of obstructive diseases.

Rev Port Pneumol 2010; XVI (2): 253-272

Key-words:
Lung function test
asthma
COPD
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografia/Bibliography
[1.]
G.L. Snider.
Distinguishing among asthma, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema.
Chest, 87 (1985), pp. 35S-39S
[2.]
J. Chang, Z. Mosenifar.
Differentiating COPD from asthma in clinical practice.
J Intensive Care Med, 22 (2007), pp. 300-309
[3.]
V. Bellia, S. Battaglia, F. Catalano, N. Scichilone, R.A. Incalzi, C. Imperiale, F. Rengo.
Aging and disability affect misdiagnosis of COPD in elderly asthmatics: the SARA study.
Chest, 123 (2003), pp. 1066-1072
[4.]
P. Enright.
The diagnosis of asthma in older patients.
Exp Lung Res, 31 (2005), pp. 15-21
[5.]
G. Di Lorenzo, P. Mansueto, V. Ditta, M. Esposito-Pellitteri, C. Lo Bianco, M.S. Leto-Barone, et al.
Similarity and differences in elderly patients with fixed airflow obstruction by asthma and by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Respir Med, 102 (2008), pp. 232-238
[6.]
P. Kardos, M. Brutsche, R. Buhl, A. Gillissen, K.F. Rabe, E.W. Russi, et al.
Combination of asthma and COPD: more frequent as considered to be?.
Pneumologie, 60 (2006), pp. 366-372
[7.]
C.R. Jenkins, P.J. Thompson, P.G. Gibson, R. Wood-Baker.
Distinguishing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: why, why not and how?.
Med J Aust, 183 (2005), pp. S35-S37
[8.]
M. Pearson, J.G. Ayres, M. Sarno, D. Massey, D. Price.
Diagnosis of airway obstruction in primary care in the UK: the CADRE (COPD and asthma diagnostic/management reassessment) programme 1997-2001.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 1 (2006), pp. 435-443
[9.]
D.G. Tinkelman, D.B. Price, R.J. Nordyke, R.J. Halbert.
Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over.
J Asthma, 43 (2006), pp. 75-80
[10.]
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. III Consenso Brasileiro no Manejo da Asma.
J Pneumol, 28 (2002), pp. S1-S28
[11.]
Global Initiative for Asthma.
Workshop Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention.
[12.]
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia.
I Consenso Brasileiro sobre Espirometria.
J Pneumol, 22 (1996), pp. 105-164
[13.]
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia.
Diretrizes para testes de função pulmonar.
J Pneumol, 28 (2002), pp. S1-S238
[14.]
ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardization of lung function testing: Standardization of spirometry.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 319-338
[15.]
ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardization of lung function testing: Standardization of the measurement of lung volumes.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 511-522
[16.]
ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardization of lung function testing. Standardization of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 720-735
[17.]
ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardization of lung function testing. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 948-968
[18.]
R.J. Knudson, M.D. Lebowitz, C.J. Holberg, B. Burrows.
Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow volume curve with growth and aging.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 27 (1983), pp. 724-725
[19.]
R.O. Crapo, A.H. Morris.
Standardized single breath normal values for carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 123 (1981), pp. 185-189
[20.]
R.O. Crapo, A.H. Morris, P.D. Clayton.
Lung volumes in healthy nonsmoking adults.
Bull Eur Physiophatol Respir, 18 (1982), pp. 419-425
[21.]
S. Siegel, N.J. Castellan Jr..
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.
2 ed., McGrawHill, (1998),
[22.]
GraphPad InStat version 3.01, Copyright 1992-1998 GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego California USA.
[24.]
D.C. Weir, Burge P. Sherwood.
Measures of reversibility in response to bronchodilators in chronic airflow obstruction:relation to airway calibre.
Thorax, 46 (1991), pp. 43-45
[25.]
R.M. Dias, E.C.C. Soares, J. Mariné Neto, M.G. Brum, A.M.S. Chibante, J.R.B. Jardim.
Resposta à inalação de broncodilatador na asma e bronquite crônica.
Pulmão RJ, 3 (1993), pp. 21-27
[26.]
J.L. Clausen.
The diagnosis of emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and asthma.
Clin Chest Med, 11 (1990), pp. 405-416
[27.]
J.J. Deeks, D.G. Altman.
Education and debate. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.
[28.]
B.A. Sin, O. Akkoca, S. Saryal, F. Oner, Z. Misirligil.
Differences between asthma and COPD in the elderly.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 16 (2006), pp. 44-50
[29.]
L. Delaunois, J. Lulling, J. Prignot.
Differential diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease, A statistical analysis of the discriminating power of various lung function tests.
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir, 12 (1976), pp. 453-466
[30.]
F.J. Martinez, C. Standiford, S.E. Gay.
Is it asthma or COPD? The answer determines proper therapy for chronic airflow obstruction.
Postgrad Med, 117 (2005), pp. 19-26
[31.]
K.M. Beeh, O. Kornmann, J. Beier, M. Ksoll, R. Buhl.
Clinical application of a simple questionnaire for the differentiation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Respir Med, 98 (2004), pp. 591-597
[32.]
D.B. Price, D.G. Tinkelman, R.J. Halbert, R.J. Nordyke, S. Isonaka, D. Nonikov, et al.
Symptom-based questionnaire for identifying COPD in smokers.
Respiration, 73 (2006), pp. 285-295
[33.]
T. Hausen, D.G. Tinkelman, A. Ostrem, T. van der Molen, C.P. van Shayck.
Symptom-based questionnaire for differentiating COPD and asthma.
Respiration, 73 (2006), pp. 277-278
[34.]
D. Kotz, P. Nelemans, C.P. van Achayck, G.J. Wesseling.
External validation of a COPD diagnostic questionnaire.
Eur Respir J, 31 (2008), pp. 298-303
Copyright © 2010. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP
Download PDF
Pulmonology
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?