Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
206
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Available online 25 February 2024
The Brompton breathing pattern assessment tool (BPAT): Portuguese translation and cultural adaptation
Visits
206
R. Vilarinhoa,b,
Corresponding author
rvilarinho@ufp.edu.pt

Corresponding author at: FP-I3ID, Escola Superior de Saúde-Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal, Rua Delfim Maia 334, Porto 4200-256, Portugal.
, C. Ribeiroc,d, V. Abreua,e, S. Souto-Mirandae,f, F. Silvaa, C. Jácomeg
a FP-I3ID, Escola Superior de Saúde-Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
b CIR, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal
c Pulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
d Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
e KinesioLab Research Unit in Human Movement, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Piaget Institute, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
f Northern Health School of Portuguese Red Cross, Oliveira de Azeméis, Portugal
g CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
This item has received
Received 19 January 2024. Accepted 31 January 2024
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Dear editor,

Within the discipline of respiratory medicine, there is a growing recognition of the relevance of breathing pattern disorders.1,2 Breathing pattern disorder, or dysfunctional breathing, is commonly characterized by an abnormal breathing pattern resulting in respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms, which may occur secondary to diseases or in its absence. The underlying mechanisms can be physiological (e.g. lung disease), but also psychological (e.g. anxiety, stress and pain) and biomechanical (e.g. overuse-related musculoskeletal injuries).3 Assessment of the breathing pattern is thus an important aspect to include in the clinical examination.

Breathing pattern assessment typically involves observation of the individual's breathing and manual assessment of thoracic movements.4 These techniques are simple and inexpensive to use, but often subjective and qualitative in nature. This subjectivity can limit reporting and interpretability in electronic health records, mainly due to the different terminologies used by healthcare professionals to describe the findings. Therefore, valid and objective tools that provide a systematic and quantitative approach to evaluate the impact of a breathing pattern disorder and monitor clinical progress are required.

The Brompton Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) was developed as a promising tool to objectively assess the breathing pattern,5 and its real-world application and psychometric properties have been studied in people with respiratory conditions, such as asthma and long-COVID.6,7 This tool could be useful in clinical practice in Portugal, but a valid translation is lacking. We aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt and examine the content validity of the Portuguese version of the Brompton BPAT.

The Brompton BPAT includes 7 items to assess the breathing pattern, namely (1) abdominal or upper chest movement; (2) inspiratory flow; (3) expiratory flow; (4) channel of inspiration and expiration; (5) air hunger; (6) respiratory rate; (7) rhythm. Answers are given on a scale of 0–2, except for item (7) where the answer is given as 0 or 2. The tool is administered by a healthcare professional who observes and scores the patient's breathing pattern at rest for one minute. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items, and can range from 0 to 14 points, with higher scores indicating an abnormal breathing pattern. A cut-off ≥4 was recently suggested to indicate a breathing pattern disorder in people with asthma.5

Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out according to international recommendations,8,9 including initial translation, evaluation of this translation and cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, and back translation. Authorization for the translation and validation process was first obtained from the original authors. The translation was performed independently by 2 native Portuguese researchers/respiratory physiotherapists fluent in English (R.V. and C.J.). These translations were evaluated by an expert panel in respiratory medicine/questionnaires validation, including the 2 translators, 1 pulmonologist (C.R.) and 2 respiratory physiotherapists (S.S. and V.A.). Disagreements about the translation were discussed by the panel in an online meeting. The expert panel suggested the inclusion of a specific instruction for the assessor to ensure that the evaluated subject is unaware that they are being observed, thus reducing the possibility of conscious changes in the breathing pattern. A synthesis of this discussion produced one common BPAT preliminary version.

A total of 10 healthcare professionals (2 pulmonologists, 5 respiratory physiotherapists, 2 musculoskeletal physiotherapists and 1 neurological physiotherapist) were invited to examine the content validity of the BPAT. After sending the BPAT, individual meetings (in person or online) following semi-structured guidelines were conducted. Based on the feedback gathered, the content of the BPAT appeared to show a valid representation of breathing pattern characteristics and all agreed that the tool would be a useful addition to clinical practice.

The expert panel met a second time to analyze all the previous contributions and to produce a final Portuguese version of the BPAT, which is available upon request. This version was back translated by one bilingual researcher with source language (English) and with no prior knowledge of the questionnaire. A copy of the English version was sent to the original authors and was approved without further suggestions.

This study describes the Portuguese translation and cultural adaptation processes of the BPAT, which is now available to be used in routine clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, there are few validated measurement instruments to assess the breathing pattern, and none validated in European Portuguese. The BPAT tool was chosen to address this important gap as it has been recently developed and has garnered considerable interest in the scientific community.10 This is due to several advantages, mainly, ease of administration, no need for manual assessment, equipment and/or specialist training.5 These allow the BPAT to be used either face-to-face or remotely using videoconferencing technology, both of which have proven to be reliable.7 Another reason for choosing this tool is that, from the expert healthcare professional perspective, it includes the assessment of relevant components of the breathing pattern disorders, namely upper/lower chest movement, respiratory rate, signs of air hunger and nose/mouth breathing.11 The BPAT also has the potential to play a crucial role in identifying core features of breathing pattern disorders, guiding interventions, and evaluating their effects in the future. The provision of the Portuguese BPAT also constitutes the first step towards future studies on the determination of the psychometric properties (i.e. validity, reliability and responsiveness) and interpretability of this tool. It is suggested for use with people with respiratory conditions, but it can also be transferred to other appropriate populations, such as people with cardiac and metabolic conditions, among others.

The Portuguese BPAT version is now available to improve the identification of breathing pattern disorders in routine clinical practice. The healthcare professionals considered its content valid and its usefulness promising. Further research is needed to examine its real-world use and measurement properties in several populations.

Sources of support

none.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

R. Vilarinho: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. C. Ribeiro: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. V. Abreu: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. S. Souto-Miranda: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. F. Silva: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. C. Jácome: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the healthcare professionals who contributed to the content validity of the Portuguese BPAT.

References
[1]
M.L. Vega, G. Schifino, L. Pisani, V. Catalanotti, I. Prediletto, S. Nava.
Diaphragm thickening fraction and inspiratory effort in patients with SARS-COV II pneumonia receiving different non-invasive respiratory supports.
Pulmonology, 29 (2023), pp. 424-427
[2]
R. Tonelli, I. Castaniere, A. Cortegiani, L. Tabbì, R. Fantini, D. Andrisani, et al.
Inspiratory effort and respiratory mechanics in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a preliminary matched control study.
Pulmonology, 29 (2023), pp. 469-477
[3]
R. Boulding, R. Stacey, R. Niven, S.J. Fowler.
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification.
Eur Respir Rev, 25 (2016), pp. 287-294
[4]
J.A. Pryor, S.A. Prasad.
Physiotherapy for respiratory and cardiac problems: adults and paediatrics.
Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone, (2008),
[5]
S. Todd, E.S. Walsted, L. Grillo, R. Livingston, A. Menzies-Gow, J.H. Hull.
Novel assessment tool to detect breathing pattern disorder in patients with refractory asthma.
Respirol, 23 (2018), pp. 284-290
[6]
H. Hylton, A. Long, C. Francis, R.R. Taylor, W.M. Ricketts, R. Singh, et al.
Real-world use of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool in assessment of breathlessness post-COVID-19.
Clin Med, 22 (2022), pp. 376-379
[7]
J. Bondarenko, M. Hew, B. Button, E. Webb, V. Jackson, R. Clark, et al.
Reliability of the breathing pattern assessment tool for in-person or remote assessment in people with asthma.
Clin Exp Allergy, 51 (2021), pp. 1218-1220
[8]
S.L. Eremenco, D. Cella, B.J. Arnold.
A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires.
Eval Health Prof, 28 (2005), pp. 212-232
[9]
Mokkink LB, Prinsen C, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet H, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. Available from:https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf.
[10]
J. Bondarenko, A.E. Holland.
Clinimetrics: the breathing pattern assessment tool.
J Physiother, 69 (2023), pp. 127
[11]
L. Grillo, A.M. Russell, H. Shannon, A. Lewis.
Physiotherapy assessment of breathing pattern disorder: a qualitative evaluation.
BMJ Open Respir Res, 10 (2023),
Copyright © 2024. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Pulmonology
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?