Journal Information
Vol. 27. Issue 5.
Pages 475-476 (September - October 2021)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 27. Issue 5.
Pages 475-476 (September - October 2021)
Correspondence
DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.07.001
Open Access
COVID-19 pneumonia and ROX index: Time to set a new threshold for patients admitted outside the ICU. Authors' reply
Visits
...
M.L. Vegaa,b,#, R. Dongillic,#, G. Olaizolad, N. Colaiannia,e, M.C. Sayata,e, L. Pisanif, M. Romagnolig, G. Spoladoreh, I. Predilettof, G. Montiela, S. Navaf,
Corresponding author
stefano.nava@unibo.it

Corresponding author at: University of Bologna Alma Mater, Chair of Respiratory Medicine, Director Post-doctoral School in Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi, Director, Respiratory Diseases and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Via Massarenti 9, 401138 Bologna, Italy.
a Non-Invasive Respiratory Support Unit, Hospital Juan A. Fernández, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Argentina
b IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care SantOrsola Hospital, Bologna Italia
c Division of Respiratory Diseases with intermediate respiratory intensive care units, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
d Unidad Asistencial Cesar Milstein. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Argentina
e Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Zabala, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Argentina
f IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care SantOrsol Hospital, Bologna Italia. Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Department of Clinical, Integrated and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy
g Pulmonology Unit, Santa Maria di Ca’ Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy
h Division of Infectious Diseases, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

We thank Dr. Garnier and Dr Blez for their careful reading of our study1 and their useful comments2

We agree with them that we may have misinterpreted their setting of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), and we apologize for the misunderstanding. It makes obviously sense that the flow was delivered at 60 L/min.3

Concerning the point of respiratory rate, we think that it is a matter of wording. We believe our statement "ROX H12 had a greater predictive value than respiratory rate alone, in contrast with Blez et al.” is true, because in their article, the authors reported an AUROC of RR of 0.81, that is superior to 0.78 (AUROC of ROX). It is a matter of mathematics, despite not being statistically significant. On the other hand, we are a bit concerned about the title of their manuscript "....better look at the respiratory rate". We strongly believe that "two is better than one" in particular in patients with COVID-19 infections. The pathophysiology of Acute Respiratory Failure during this pandemic is complex and not fully understood. Everyone dealing with these patients has noticed that the respiratory frequency and tidal volume may be affected differently in specific subgroups of patients. Increases in tidal volume are presumably due to higher recruitment of respiratory premotor neurons, whereas changes in frequency may be related to the network activity of the neurons located in the pre-Botzinger complex. In addition, COVID-19 patients with similar oxygenation efficiency may have markedly different compliance. This makes the combination of respiratory pattern and respiratory mechanics complex and multifactorial. Not surprisingly, a consistent group of patients may show the so-called “non-dyspnogenic acute hypoxia” while others, for the same level of PaO2, show an important distress. Obviously respiratory pattern may influence the PaO2/FiO2 ratio,4 but SaO2 is also determined by the efficiency of the a-c membrane. So to make a long story short, it is not only a matter of “less is more”.

Indeed, Drs Garnier and Blez argued that the ROX H12 "is a time point too late to really impact management in case of failure". The median time of HFNC failure, however, has been reported to vary but it is on average >24 h.5-7 Thus, this may suggest that a ROXH12 may give the clinician a better overview of the patient's outcomes, than a more praecox measurement.

References
[1]
ML Vega, R Dongilli, G Olaizola, et al.
COVID-19 pneumonia and ROX index: time to set a new threshold for patients admitted outside the ICU.
[2]
Garnier M, Blez D. ROX monitoring in critical COVID-19 patients treated with high flow oxygen: a real added value compared to the respiratory rate?Pulmonology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.011. [Epub ahead of print].
[3]
D Blez, A Soulier, F Bonnet, et al.
Monitoring of high-flow nasal cannula for SARS-CoV-2 severe pneumonia: less is more, better look at respiratory rate.
Intensive Care Med, 46 (2020), pp. 2094-2095
[4]
I Prediletto, L D Antoni, P Carbonara, et al.
Standardizing PaO2 for PaCO2 in P/F ratio predicts in-hospital mortality in acute respiratory failure due to Covid-19: a pilot prospective study.
[5]
GL Calligaro, U Lalla, G Audley, et al.
The utility of high-flow nasal oxygen for severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a resource-constrained setting: a multi-centre prospective observational study.
[6]
T Guy, A Créac'hcadec, C Ricordel, et al.
High-flow nasal oxygen: a safe, efficient treatment for COVID-19 patients not in an ICU.
Eur Respir J, 56 (2020 Nov 12),
[7]
M Patel, A Gangemi, R Marron, et al.
Retrospective analysis of high flow nasal therapy in COVID-19-related moderate-to-severe hypoxaemic respiratory failure.
BMJ Open Respir Res, 7 (2020),

Contributed equally to the work and should both be considered as first author

Copyright © 2021. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Pulmonology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?