Journal Information
Vol. 20. Issue 4.
Pages 208-210 (July - August 2014)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
8439
Vol. 20. Issue 4.
Pages 208-210 (July - August 2014)
Brief Communication
Open Access
Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis symptoms among children living in Coimbra, Portugal
Prevalência dos sintomas de asma e rinite nas crianças a viver em Coimbra, Portugal
Visits
8439
M. Muca,b,
Corresponding author
magdalenamuc@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, A. Mota-Pintoc, C. Padeza,b
a Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
b Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Portugal
c General Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis symptoms among 6–7 year old Portuguese children living in the district of Coimbra in 2012 estimated using the ISAAC tools in comparison to the data from Portuguese cities from 2002 obtained within the ISAAC phase III.
Full Text

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in pediatrics. Most data on the prevalence of childhood allergic diseases come from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) phase II held in 1995 and phase III from 2002. ISAAC created a methodology for studying two age groups 6–7 and 13–14 years old.1 In 2002, according to the data gathered in the phase III of ISAAC, the prevalence of asthma among Portuguese children from 6 to 7 years old was 9.4%, 29.1% for rhinitis and 28.1% for wheezing.2

In the last decade, little information on the prevalence of childhood asthma and rhinitis in Portugal has been documented, and to the best of our knowledge, none in Coimbra. In 2002, 5 centers from 5 Portuguese cities joined the ISAAC project: Lisbon, Oporto, Coimbra, Portimão and Funchal. The Coimbra research center only studied 13–14 years old adolescents.2

The district of Coimbra, with a total area of 3974km2, is located in central Portugal and has 434,311 inhabitants. Coimbra is the biggest city in the central region, and the 6th largest in Portugal.3

The most recent published data on childhood asthma prevalence in Portugal come from the Lisbon 2008 study where the prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and wheezing was 5.6%, 43.0% and 43.3%, respectively,4 and from Matosinhos (data from 2009) where the prevalence of asthma among the children 0–7 years old was 9.56%.5 A large national prevalence study based on The Portuguese National Asthma Survey reported the prevalence of 6.2% of current asthma for the Central region and 7.2% for the age group <18 years in the whole country.6

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of asthma and rhinitis in the population of 6–8 years old children from the district of Coimbra.

ISAAC based core asthma and rhinitis questionnaires, containing questions about the prevalence and frequency of asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms of a child in the past 12 months and in a lifetime, were handed into the legal guardians of children in the 1st and 2nd grades of primary school in Coimbra. The Estimated number of children from the 1st and 2nd grade in the Coimbra district was 8200 (National Census 2011). The sample size was calculated based on the confidence interval of 95%, prevalence of 10%2 and for the narrow margin of error of 2% that a sample of 782 individuals would be enough.

The response rate was 65% (N=1063) and there was no significant difference between the private vs public schools (p=0.88) as well as so among the urban, suburban and rural zones (p=0.42). After excluding children with chronic disease as opposed to atopic, a sample of 1037 children from 32 schools (28 public and 4 private) in the Coimbra district were included in the analysis, 50.8% were girls and 49.2% boys (95%CI 45.9–52.0), the mean age was 7.26 years old (95%CI 7.22–7.30). As the attendance of children from urban zones was higher than expected (72% compared to 57% for the district3) we applied the post-stratification weights for the zone type. At least one episode of asthma in a lifetime was reported in 10.4% of the studied population (95%CI 8.6–12.3). At least one wheezing episode was experienced by 35.2% (95%CI 32.3–38.2) of the studied children and 11.8% (95%CI 9.8–13.8) had at least one attack within the past 12 months. Prevalence of lifetime rhinitis and current rhinitis was 22.8 (95%CI 20.2–25.4) and 19.4 (95%CI 17.0–21.9) respectively. In our study, the prevalence of lifetime asthma was 10.4% (95%CI 8.6–12.3) which is slightly higher than the national prevalence recorded in 2002 (9.4%) and higher than most cities in 2002 with the exception of Funchal (14.2%).

The national prevalence of wheezing in children aged 6–7 years old measured using the ISAAC tools in a lifetime in 2002 was 28.1%. Our study revealed a very high prevalence of wheezing episodes at least once in child's life, 35.2% (95%CI 32.3–38.2). This is not only higher than all of the values reported in 6–7 year old children in 2002, but also higher than all of the adolescent prevalence.2 Although the prevalence could be biased by the understanding of the term “wheeze” (in Portuguese “pieira”), which differs between the health specialists and parents,7 it is unlikely as the methodology used in all the studies was the same. There is no reason to think that the common understanding of this term could change significantly over a decade. With the lack of data from Coimbra center on our age group from both 1995 and 2002, and the 10 years interval between the studies, we cannot be sure if the prevalence increased during this period, or if Coimbra indeed has a higher prevalence of lifetime wheezing than other Portuguese cities.

In Lisbon, where a group of 342 students between 5 and 12 years of age participated in a study, the lifetime asthma rate was lower than in the phase III of ISAAC study (5.6% compared to 7.8% in the phase III); however wheezing episodes occurring at least once in a lifetime were reported in 13.1% more children than in 2002.4 These results suggest that the wheeze prevalence could indeed be increasing among Portuguese children.

The prevalence comparisons between our study and data gathered during the phase III of ISAAC in Portugal are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis symptoms among 6–7 year old Portuguese children living in the district of Coimbra in 2012 estimated using the ISAAC tools in comparison to the data from Portuguese cities from 2002 obtained within the ISAAC phase III.

  Portugal6–7 (2002)  Portugal13–14 (2002)  Coimbra6–7 (2012)  Coimbra13–14 (2002)  Oporto6–7 (2002)  Oporto13–14 (2002)  Lisbon6–7 (2002)  Lisbon13–14 (2002)  Portimão6–7 (2002)  Portimão13–14 (2002)  Funchal6–7 (2002)  Funchal13–14 (2002) 
  Prevalence % (n)
Total n      1037  1177  2464  3336  2477  3024  1069  1109  1819  3161 
Wheeze ever  28.1 (1512)  21.8 (2576)  34.4 (347)  20.6 (242)  10.0 (246)  22.1 (736)  30.2 (748)  25.9 (784)  28.4 (304)  18.2 (202)  25.3 (460)  19.4 (612) 
Wheeze in the past 12 months  12.9 (692)  11.8 (1398)  11.9 (120)  10.7 (126)  2.3 (56)  13.1 (437)  14.2 (351)  14.6 (443)  13.2 (141)  9.7 (108)  11.0 (200)  9.0 (284) 
4 or more attacks of wheeze in the past 12 months      3.1 (31)  2.6 (31)  2.7 (67)  2.6 (87)  3.4 (83)  3.5 (105)  2.5 (27)  2.2 (24)  2.1 (38)  1.9 (60) 
Sleep disturbance from wheeze, 1 or more nights a week in the past 12 months      2.2 (22)  1.0 (12)  2.5 (61)  1.5 (51)  3.4 (84)  2.1 (62)  3.6 (38)  1.8 (20)  4.1 (74)  1.5 (46) 
Speech limited by wheeze in the past 12 months      1.9 (19)  2.2 (26)  10.0 (247)  2.8 (95)  2.9 (72)  3.5 (107)  2.1 (22)  2.1 (23)  3.3 (60)  2.7 (84) 
Asthma ever  9.4 (505)  14.7 (1737)  10.6 (107)  12.2 (144)  5.7 (140)  15.1 (504)  7.8 (194)  15.6 (472)  4.9 (52)  12.4 (138)  14.2 (259)  15.2 (479) 
Wheeze during or after exercise in the past 12 months      6.4 (65)  19.5 (229)  30.8 (759)  21.0 (701)  7.1 (176)  24.8 (751)  5.5 (59)  18.2 (202)  7.0 (117)  21.2 (670) 
Night cough in the past 12 months      24.2 (245)  30.5 (359)  26.1 (644)  32.9 (1097)  32.7 (809)  35.4 (1070)  29.4 (314)  31.4 (348)  32.9 (599)  34.1 (1079) 
Nose symptoms ever  29.1 (1565)  37.1 (4383)  23.1 (234)  31.8 (374)  22.1 (544)  41.8 (1394)  31.2 (774)  39.7 (1202)  28.0 (299)  34.4 (382)  27.0 (492)  32.6 (1031) 
Nose symptoms in the past 12 months  24 (1291)  26.5 (3131)  19.7 (199)  23.9 (281)  7.5 (186)  31.7 (1056)  26.3 (651)  29.0 (878)  23.1 (247)  21.7 (241)  21.6 (393)  21.4 (675) 
Nose and eye symptoms in the past 12 months      9.3 (94)  6.5 (76)  0.7 (18)  10.3 (344)  10.1 (249)  10.6 (320)  8.2 (88)  7.2 (80)  9.4 (171)  8.9 (280) 
Nose symptoms affecting activities a lot in the past 12 months      1.6 (3)  0.3 (3)  2.7 (67)  0.5 (18)  1.0 (25)  0.6 (17)  0.9 (10)  0.2 (2)  1.5 (28)  1.1 (36) 
Hayfever ever  4.2 (227)  7.5 (134)  1 (10)  14.0 (165)  7.4 (182)  5.0 (168)  2.7 (67)  6.4 (194)  3.6 (38)  7.3 (81)  6.7 (122)  8.7 (275) 
Symptoms of rhino conjunctivitis in the past 12 months      18.4 (186)  6.5 (76)  16.8 (413)  10.3 (342)  10.0 (247)  10.5 (317)  7.9 (84)  7.1 (79)  9.2 (167)  8.7 (276) 

It has been estimated that, in Portugal, we can expect 20,250 new cases of asthma annually.8 Asthma and allergic diseases continue to be a global health concern, and Portugal does not seem to be an exception.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data and that all the patients included in the study received sufficient information and gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia number SFRH/BD/66877/2009

Conflicts of interest

This work was supported by a grant of the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia number SFRH/BD/66877/2009.

References
[1]
M.I. Asher, U. Keil, H.R. Anderson, R. Beasley, J. Crane, F. Martinez, et al.
International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods.
Eur respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 483-491
[2]
J. Rosado Pinto.
ISAAC – 20 anos em Portugal.
Acta Pediatr Port, 42 (2011), pp. S35-S40
[3]
Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Centro, Caracterização socio-economica do Distrito de Coimbra [Socio-economic characterization of the district of Coimbra], August 2009 (https://www.ccdrc.pt/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&Itemid=91&gid=1106&lang=pt) (in Portuguese).
[4]
P.N. Pegas, C.A. Alves, M.G. Scotto, M.G. Evtyugina, C.A. Pio, M.C. Freitas.
Factores de risco e prevalência de asma e rinite em crianças em idade escolar em Lisboa.
Rev Port Pneumol, 17 (2011), pp. 109-116
[5]
J. de Sousa, M. Santo, T. Colaço, F. Almada-Lobo, J. Yaphe.
Asthma in an urban population in Portugal: A prevalence study.
BMC Public Health, 11 (2011), pp. 347
[6]
A. Sa-Sousa, M. Morais-Almeida, L. Azevedo, R. Carvalho, T. Jacinto, A. Todo-Bom, et al.
Prevalence of asthma in Portugal-The Portuguese National Asthma Survey.
Clin Transl Allergy, 2 (2012), pp. 15
[7]
R. Fernandes, B. Robalo, C. Calado, S. Medeiros, A. Saianda, J. Figueira, et al.
The meaning of wheezing for parents and health professionals: a questionnaire survey in Portuguese.
BMC Pediatrics, 11 (2011), pp. 112
[8]
J.C. de Sousa, M.L. Silva, F.A. Lobo, J. Yaphe.
Asthma incidence and accuracy of diagnosis in the Portuguese sentinel practice network.
Prim Care Respir J, 19 (2010), pp. 352-357
Copyright © 2013. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Download PDF
Pulmonology
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?