Journal Information
Vol. 19. Issue 3.
Pages 86-87 (May - June 2013)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 19. Issue 3.
Pages 86-87 (May - June 2013)
Editorial
Open Access
No more hic sunt dracones: Portugal is in the COPD map
Sem mais hic sunt dracones: Portugal encontra-se no mapa da DPOC
Visits
10559
J.B. Sorianoa,
Corresponding author
jbsoriano@caubet-cimera.es

Corresponding author.
, B. Lamprechtb,c
a Program of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Fundación Caubet-CIMERA Illes Balears, Recinte Hospital Joan March, Bunyola, Spain
b Department of Pulmonary Medicine, General Hospital Linz, Austria
c Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
Related content
C. Bárbara, F. Rodrigues, H. Dias, J. Cardoso, J. Almeida, M.J. Matos, P. Simão, M. Santos, J.R. Ferreira, M. Gaspar, L. Gnatiuc, P. Burney
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Oceanic explorers used to denote dangerous or unexplored territories with the Latin quote “Hic sunt dracones”, that is “Here be dragons”, in imitation of the medieval practice of putting dragons, sea serpents and other mythological creatures into uncharted areas of maps. We do not know whether Fernão de Magalhães (1480–1521) and his acolytes ever smoked, and it is very unlikely that he ever performed any archaic lung function testing, but now the analogy would no longer pertain to COPD in Portugal. This is why the first Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) study report in Portugal is so welcome.1

The European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS),2 initially studied the prevalence of asthma in young adults, and then the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC) analyzed the child population,3 and the Portuguese participation provided valuable data widely used elsewhere.4–7 In the very same way BOLD has aimed to obtain population prevalence data of COPD using standardized spirometry and definitions. From its onset in 2004,8 and up to December 2012, BOLD was completed in 23 centres worldwide, and another six sites are expected to complete data collection in 2013.

The highly cited, influential Global Burden of Disease (GBD) studies estimated that COPD causes the death of at least 2.9 million people annually. Estimates of COPD as sixth in the global mortality ranking in 1990,9 were revised upwards to fourth in 2006 and were projected to be the third by 2020.10 To many people's surprise, a GBD 2010 new update, which has just been released, identified some mortality trends were declining.11 So, from all the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at a global level, only COPD and congenital anomalies have declined, yet chronic respiratory diseases as a group accounted for 4.7% of global DALYs, with COPD making up two-thirds of the total and asthma nearly a fifth of the total.12 Data from Barbara et al.1 are expected to be included in any new GBD update.

It is a fact, as discussed in their introductory remarks,1 that there were very little previous data on COPD in Portugal; they had been minimally represented by a small non-comparative study, which only had pre-BD spirometry data, from 2002.13 Now, using data with the highest validity, clinicians, investigators and health administrators can start quoting figures about the prevalence of COPD in Portugal; it is 14.2%, 18.7% in men and 10.5% in women, and the vast majority (86.8%) is as yet undiagnosed. Using back of an envelope calculations, one can extrapolate that from a total population of 10.5 million, among 5.4 million Portuguese adults aged 40 years and older,14 at least 750,000 suffer from COPD, and more than 660,000 are still undiagnosed.

These estimates, using the COPD GOLD fixed ratio definition of post-BD FEV1/FVC<0.70, place Portugal in the European average. COPD in Portugal is more frequent in men, and it increases with age, and with more smoking exposure. These very basic, confirmatory estimates of descriptive epidemiology have been long awaited. As well as its novelty factor, the use of a random digit dialling (RDD) telephone sampling to screen for potential responders is innovative and appropriate. However, critical appraisal of limitations include the 27% response rate, although the non-response study seems reassuring in relation to the final representativity of the obtained sample to the general population, with no differences in responders vs. non-responders in terms of age, smoking, previous respiratory diseases, or comorbidities; only for gender. Overall, the 20.2% crude prevalence was downgraded to 14.2%. Data only relates to Lisbon, while high heterogeneity is seen in other national studies with multiple centres and areas.15,16 Given that the fieldwork was carried out in 2008, an update will be deemed necessary in due course. Of interest are the high frequency of airflow limitation in never-smokers, to exploring other centres within the Portuguese geography, and local determinants of COPD in women,17 all are potential avenues for future research.

Monitoring epidemiological trends is an arduous, lengthy undertaking. With an estimated 210 million people worldwide suffering from COPD, but with 80% or higher yet undiagnosed, there remain many large areas in the Globe with blank data regarding spirometry-based COPD estimates.

Since you cannot manage what you do not measure, the first step to counter any major health problem is to measure its burden. This very basic, fundamental Public Health principle applies well to COPD. Thanks to Barbara et al.,1 Portugal is no longer a blank spot in the COPD map.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgment

BL was the recipient of a 2012 European Respiratory Society Short-Term Fellowship coded STRTF 326-2011.

References
[1]
Barbara C, Rodrigues F, Dias H, Cardoso J, Almeida J, Matos MJ, et al. COPD prevalence in Lisbon, Portugal: the burden of obstructive lung disease study (BOLD). Rev Portug Pneumol. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.11.004.
[2]
European Community Respiratory Health Survey.
Variations in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms, self-reported asthma attacks, and use of asthma medication in the European Community respiratory health survey (ECRHS).
Eur Respir J, 9 (1996), pp. 687-695
[3]
The International Study of Asthma, Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee.
Worldwide variations in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC).
Eur Respir J, 12 (1998), pp. 315-335
[4]
M.M. de Almeida, J.R. Pinto.
Bronchial asthma in children: clinical and epidemiologic approach in different Portuguese speaking countries.
Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl, 18 (1999), pp. 49-53
[5]
L.M. Borrego, M. César, P. Leiria-Pinto, J.E. Rosado-Pinto.
Prevalence of asthma in a Portuguese countryside town: repercussions on absenteeism and self-concept.
Allergol Immunopathol Madr, 33 (2005), pp. 93-99
[6]
H. Falcão, E. Ramos, A. Marques, H. Barros.
Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis in 13 year old adolescents in Porto, Portugal.
Rev Port Pneumol, 14 (2008), pp. 747-768
[7]
P.N. Pegas, C.A. Alves, M.G. Scotto, M.G. Evtyugina, C.A. Pio, M.C. Freitas.
Risk factors and prevalence of asthma and rhinitis among primary school children in Lisbon.
Rev Port Pneumol, 17 (2011), pp. 109-116
[8]
A.S. Buist, W.M. Vollmer, S.D. Sullivan, K.B. Weiss, T.A. Lee, A.M. Menezes, et al.
The Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Initiative (BOLD): rationale and design.
COPD, 2 (2005), pp. 277-283
[9]
C.J. Murray, A.D. Lopez.
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.
Lancet, 349 (1997), pp. 1498-1504
[10]
A.D. Lopez, K. Shibuya, C. Rao, et al.
The Global Burden of COPD: future COPD projections.
Eur Respir J, 27 (2006), pp. 397-412
[11]
C.J.L. Murray, M. Ezzati, A.D. Flaxman, S. Lim, R. Lozano, C. Michaud, et al.
GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics.
Lancet, 380 (2012), pp. 2063-2066
[12]
C.J.L. Murray, T. Vos, R. Lozano, et al.
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Lancet, 380 (2012), pp. 2197-2223
[13]
J. Cardoso, J. Reis Ferreira, J. Almeida, et al.
Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Portugal.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, (2003), pp. A110
[14]
Statistics of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Data extracted from http://stats.oecd.org [accessed 21.12.12].
[15]
W.C. Tan, J. Bourbeau, J.M. Fitzgerald, R. Cowie, K. Chapman, P. Hernandez, et al.
Can age and sex explain the variation in COPD rates across large urban cities? A population study in Canada.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 15 (2011), pp. 1691-1698
[16]
J.B. Soriano, M. Miravitlles, L. Borderías, E. Duran-Tauleria, F. García Río, J. Martínez, et al.
Geographical variations in the prevalence of COPD in Spain: relationship to smoking, death rates and other determining factors.
Arch Bronconeumol, 46 (2010), pp. 522-530
[17]
Ancochea J, Miravitlles M, García-Río F, Muñoz L, Sánchez G, Sobradillo V, et al. Underdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women: Quantification of the problem, determinants and proposed actions. Arch Bronconeumol. 2013 Jan 11. doi:pii: S0300-2896(12)00332-8. 10.1016/j.arbres.2012.11.010. [Epub ahead of print] English, Spanish.
Copyright © 2012. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Download PDF
Pulmonology
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?